+1 to "multi-site" (maybe even augmented with, dare I say "replication"), though I personally don't have a problem with WAN. Of course, that might seem dated, but then I am getting older, ;-)
Perhaps WAN with a short description.. "Multi-Site Replication for Active/Active, Active/Passive (DR), Sunsetting, ..." (etc with any other easy to summarize UCs. On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 2:04 PM, Michael Stolz <mst...@pivotal.io> wrote: > I like multi-site. It means physical isolation. > > -- > Mike Stolz > Principal Engineer - Gemfire Product Manager > Mobile: 631-835-4771 > On Jun 17, 2016 5:02 PM, "Gregory Chase" <gch...@pivotal.io> wrote: > > > On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 11:56 AM, Gregory Chase <gch...@pivotal.io> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Boom! "Multi-site' or "Multi-Cluster" > > > > > > > > > > > At the risk of sounding like I'm "+1"-ing myself, consider this bullet > > comes on the next row after "clustering". So if it says "multi-cluster" > or > > "multi-clustering" with that cool cloud to cloud icon, I think it gets > the > > message across that John so well described. > > > > -Greg > > > > -- > > Greg Chase > > > > Global Head, Big Data Communities > > http://www.pivotal.io/big-data > > > > Pivotal Software > > http://www.pivotal.io/ > > > > 650-215-0477 > > @GregChase > > Blog: http://geekmarketing.biz/ > > > -- -John 503-504-8657 john.blum10101 (skype)
