That is good feedback for their feedback. On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 9:10 AM, Dave Barnes <dbar...@pivotal.io> wrote:
> My first question is what's the goal - is there another ASF site that would > serve as an example to follow? > Our current Apache info is a menu item at the bottom of the page. From the > report, I gather that the auditor wants to see the logos and disclaimer > "above the fold". More prominent logos can be easily done, once we agree on > where they should be located. > Can I safely assume that a [link to the disclaimer] is sufficient? > The branding guide (http://incubator.apache.org/guides/branding.html) > lacks > specifics. > > On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 9:20 PM, Greg Chase <gregch...@apache.org> wrote: > > > Dear Geode community, > > I see the Apache Geode website got tagged with a minor branding concern > in > > a recent audit of incubating projects. > > > > See the wiki entry here: > > https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/BrandingAuditJune2016 > > > > See start of the thread in gene...@incubator.apache.org here: > > > > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201606.mbox/%3CCAOqetn-c49sfXSMck8hx%3DjGZQEw6paEmbdtMg32meLkHKcTPnQ%40mail.gmail.com%3E > > > > Basically the Apache & Apache incubator logos, and the incubator > disclaimer > > are not prominent enough, but at least they are present. > > > > Next time we look at a website update, we might see how we can make these > > more obvious. > > > > Suggestions are welcome on this thread. > > > > -Greg > > >
