Comment will be remove.
Dor

-----Original Message-----
From: Anthony Baker [mailto:aba...@pivotal.io] 
Sent: יום ג 26 יולי 2016 18:22
To: dev@geode.incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [GitHub] incubator-geode pull request #199: GEODE-88: code fixes 
for c++ client

Based on my reading of [1] and [2] I don’t think the comment is necessary and 
should be removed.  Any other opinions?

Anthony

[1] http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html
[2] http://www.apache.org/dev/apply-license.html#contributor-copyright


> On Jul 26, 2016, at 12:38 AM, doribd <g...@git.apache.org> wrote:
> 
> Github user doribd commented on a diff in the pull request:
> 
>    
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-geode/pull/199#discussion_r7220166
> 0
> 
>    --- Diff: 
> geode-client-native/src/cppcache/impl/ThinClientRedundancyManager.hpp ---
>    @@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ namespace gemfire {
>        void netDown( );
>        void acquireRedundancyLock( ) { m_redundantEndpointsLock.acquire_read( 
> ); }
>        void releaseRedundancyLock( ) { m_redundantEndpointsLock.release( ); }
>    -   volatile bool allEndPointDiscon() { return m_IsAllEpDisCon;}
>    +   bool allEndPointDiscon() { return m_IsAllEpDisCon;} //Copyright: 
> Amdocs Software Systems Limited, 2016
>    --- End diff --
> 
>    Are we required to remove this line?
> 
> 
> ---
> If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have 
> your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have 
> this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but 
> not working, please contact infrastructure at 
> infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA.
> ---


This message and the information contained herein is proprietary and 
confidential and subject to the Amdocs policy statement,
you may review at http://www.amdocs.com/email_disclaimer.asp

Reply via email to