+1 to remove it

On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 9:33 PM, John Blum <jb...@pivotal.io> wrote:

> +1 - forget deprecated; delete it.
>
> On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 8:22 PM, Udo Kohlmeyer <ukohlme...@pivotal.io>
> wrote:
>
> > +1 - I see no real benefit for this.
> >
> >
> >
> > On 12/10/16 1:10 pm, William Markito wrote:
> >
> >> +1 -  We always discouraged people using dynamic regions
> >>
> >> On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 4:33 PM, Dan Smith <dsm...@pivotal.io> wrote:
> >>
> >> I'd like to reopen the discussion about deprecating
> >>> DynamicRegionFactory. This is some old crufty code I don't think we
> >>> want anyone to use. I see we had a ticket to deprecated it
> >>> (GEODE-388), but we chose not to do it because we don't have an
> >>> alternative API to create regions from the client (GEODE-215).
> >>>
> >>> The thing is, there is a pretty easy workaround to use functions to
> >>> create regions from the client. Personally I'd recommend that over
> >>> DynamicRegionFactory. Can we just deprecate DynamicRegionFactory now
> >>> and implement GEODE-215 later?
> >>>
> >>> -Dan
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
>
>
> --
> -John
> 503-504-8657
> john.blum10101 (skype)
>

Reply via email to