Hey Marc, thanks for bringing up the subject, and sorry for a late reply.
Best regards, Bart -- Bart van den Eijnden OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Expert service straight from the developers. On Oct 10, 2012, at 9:18 AM, Marc Jansen <jan...@terrestris.de> wrote: > Hi all, > > I personally feel that GeoExt2 is basically ready for prime time. We used it > successfully in some fairtly big applications and only found minor > bugs/annoyments we already fixed in the codebase. There is still at least one > fixed bug I am going to integrate into the master-branch soon. Great to hear you've used it in real life, we haven't as yet unfortunately. > > Nevertheless, I suggest to start the release process for the version 2 of > GeoExt. > > Do you share that opinion? Yes, please. Anything to adopt a broader use. > > I think that there is still a lot of work, though: > We should double check all classes and examples with regard to > API compatibility with v. 1 > documentation > tests > and some sort of coding style True, some quality checks are in order. > Where will we be hosting the API docs? Are we going to change geoext.org? Or > shall we simply stick with gh-pages? Are we going to integrate runnable > examples inside of the documentation? gh-pages sounds okay. What effort do you think is involved wrt the runnable examples? I wouldn't delay the release for this personally. > > We also need some prose docs / tutorials > about migrating existing application True, did you keep any notes when upgrading your applications? > > building a single-file application Doesn't Alexandre's example serve as that? > getting the best out of MVC We could just point to Ext blogs / tutorials on the subject or not? I don't see where the GeoExt2 use case here is specific. > API-changes (If we have any) > What is the release procedure? Are the steps outlined here > (http://trac.geoext.org/wiki/Release/Procedure) still relevant? > I suggest starting with an early beta version in the next few days, so that > we can make people aware of GeoExt2 and hopefully get feedback about the > library. > > In case you agree with the starting of the release process, we also need to > decide who will be the release manager? If you would want to be release manager, that would be great. I'll also try and help out as much as possible, feel free to assign me some specific tasks. > > What other points / aspects did I miss? > > Please tell me your opinions and about the next steps needed to get to GeoExt > 2.0-beta. > > Best regards, > Marc > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Dev mailing list > Dev@geoext.org > http://www.geoext.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev
_______________________________________________ Dev mailing list Dev@geoext.org http://www.geoext.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev
