Hi Worth, we are definitely interested in a pull request (or multiple if it makes sense to split up the functionality).
Keep us posted. TIA. Best regards, Bart -- Bart van den Eijnden OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Expert service straight from the developers. On Jun 26, 2013, at 5:31 PM, Worth Lutz <w...@mindspring.com> wrote: > Greetings, > > I’ve tried to use GeoExt2 on an ExtJS project of mine. I had some problems > and had to write some of my own components using GeoExt2 as an example. > > Here is a brief description of my problems. > > OpenLayers objects require instantiated objects in their configuration > objects. This does not fit in with the new ExtJS4 architecture. I did not > want to instantiate my map with specific code in the launch function. > > I have created a map component which can receive a JSON configuration from > the server. I have this working for a limited part of OpenLayers (the parts I > need J). > > I create my applications using Sencha Architect. I can include GeoExt2 type > components that I created in the project now. I do not have to build a map > in the launch method or instantiate all the layers in the map there. Layer > definitions come in the JSON configuration for the map or have there own. > Same for other OpenLayers objects. I can change the JSON definition of the > map and my application changes without modification. > > Using techniques demonstrated in GeoExt2, I have other control components > which can be bound to one of the maps in the application. > > After I finish my current project, I should have some time to put together > some examples to go with my code and submit a pull request if you are > interested. > > Worth Lutz > > From: dev-boun...@geoext.org [mailto:dev-boun...@geoext.org] On Behalf Of > Bart van den Eijnden > Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2013 10:14 AM > To: Marc Jansen > Cc: GeoExt Dev > Subject: Re: [Dev] Next steps towards GeoExt 2 > > Hey Marc, > > trying to reboot this, any plans to work on a GeoExt 2 release before FOSS4G? > > Latest is now Ext 4.2.1. > > Best regards, > Bart > > -- > Bart van den Eijnden > OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org > Expert service straight from the developers. > > > > On Oct 16, 2012, at 9:10 AM, Marc Jansen <jan...@terrestris.de> wrote: > > > Hi Eric, > > thanks for the comments. Good I can count you and Bart in :-) > > Regards, > Marc > > > On 12.10.2012 11:19, Eric Lemoine wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 9:18 AM, Marc Jansen <jan...@terrestris.de> wrote: > > Hi all, > > Hi Marc > > > > I personally feel that GeoExt2 is basically ready for prime time. We used it > successfully in some fairtly big applications and only found minor > bugs/annoyments we already fixed in the codebase. There is still at least > one fixed bug I am going to integrate into the master-branch soon. > > Nevertheless, I suggest to start the release process for the version 2 of > GeoExt. > > Do you share that opinion? > > Yes. I was thinking about an alpha release, or 0.1. > > > > I think that there is still a lot of work, though: > > We should double check all classes and examples with regard to > > API compatibility with v. 1 > documentation > tests > and some sort of coding style > > Where will we be hosting the API docs? Are we going to change geoext.org? Or > shall we simply stick with gh-pages? Are we going to integrate runnable > examples inside of the documentation? > > For an alpha release I'd go with gh-pages for the API docs. We could > also use gh-pages for hosting the examples and the test runner. > > > > We also need some prose docs / tutorials > about migrating existing application > building a single-file application > getting the best out of MVC > API-changes (If we have any) > > What is the release procedure? Are the steps outlined here > (http://trac.geoext.org/wiki/Release/Procedure) still relevant? > > With the GeoExt project now using GitHub this procedure should be updated. > > > I suggest starting with an early beta version in the next few days, so that > we can make people aware of GeoExt2 and hopefully get feedback about the > library. > > I do think we should start with that. > > > > In case you agree with the starting of the release process, we also need to > decide who will be the release manager? > > Go for it :) I'll help as much as I can. > > > > What other points / aspects did I miss? > > Please tell me your opinions and about the next steps needed to get to > GeoExt 2.0-beta. > +1 > > > > Thanks a lot Marc! > > > > > > -- > > Dipl.-Geogr. Marc Jansen > — Anwendungsentwickler — > > terrestris GmbH & Co. KG > Pützchens Chaussee 56 > 53227 Bonn > > Tel: +49 (0)228 / 96 28 99 -53 > Fax: +49 (0)228 / 96 28 99 -57 > > Email: jan...@terrestris.de > Web: http://www.terrestris.de > > Amtsgericht Bonn, HRA 6835, Komplementärin: terrestris Verwaltungs- > gesellschaft mbH, vertreten durch: Hinrich Paulsen, Till Adams > > _______________________________________________ > Dev mailing list > Dev@geoext.org > http://www.geoext.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev > > No virus found in this message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > Version: 2013.0.3345 / Virus Database: 3199/6440 - Release Date: 06/25/13
_______________________________________________ Dev mailing list Dev@geoext.org http://www.geoext.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev
