I think that Peter meant that installing jk2 connector for tomcat can be sometimes a pain....
And when I thought about that idea more it will be nice to have one simple integration option, (scripts etc...) so that newbie can simply install apache2 for serving static content, svn php etc.... Than Geronimo bundled with Tomcat, and at last to connect two of them (meaning Tomcat with Apache2). It is something that can be done with JBoss and surly it will be naaa if Geronimo have problems with that, but looking at tomcat code I can see no reason for jk2 connectors not to work when deployed inside Geronimo. I didn't studied Geronimo code nor GBeans etc so question to gurus: "Do you see any problem with jk2 connector when Tomcat is running inside Geronimo". > -----Original Message----- > From: Alan Cabrera [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, June 21, 2004 2:19 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: User list? Bundle? > > > Sorry, at the moment we have no plans on including that server with > Geronimo. > > > Regards, > Alan > > -----Original Message----- > From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Peter Nabbefeld > Sent: Monday, June 21, 2004 7:59 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: User list? Bundle? > > Alan D. Cabrera schrieb: > > > Sorry, I missed that part about installing Apache httpd with Tomcat. > > Why would you install both Apache httpd and Tomcat? > > While Tomcat is a wonderful Servlet container, it does not > have the same > > power and extensibility as Apache httpd. I don't want to use > only Java, > but also Perl and other languages. > > > > You are talking > > about the non-java httpd server, right? > > Yes. > > Peter > > > > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > Visit our Internet site at http://www.reuters.com > > Get closer to the financial markets with Reuters Messaging - for more > information and to register, visit http://www.reuters.com/messaging > > Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual > sender, except where the sender specifically states them to be > the views of Reuters Ltd. >
