Re: Geronimo subprojects?

[Alan D. Cabrera]

Bruce Snyder wrote, On 5/29/2005 2:08 AM: On 5/28/05, Dain Sundstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Each subproject has an inherent amount of overhead. For example, each subproject needs a separate project management committee, each one will need to produce releases (not an easy task) and so on. I would sat that "there is a demonstrated desire" when we have enough people showing up to handle the overhead and work on the code. I personally would say one person is not enough, and seven is more then enough. I don't think that every subproject needs it's own PMC unless it's a subproject wholly separate from the existing Geronimo modules. For example, if the Spring kernel were brought in as a subproject, it would need its own PMC, but I don't think splitting up the existing modules and forming individual PMCs is necessary. I agree.  IMHO, those projects that could qualify as being subprojects worthy of having a PMC seem to already be at codehaus. Regards, Alan