On May 31, 2005, at 12:19 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
Fine with me, though I'm not sure we really need sandbox --
unstable is unstable, right? Whatever.
Well, maybe. For example, refactoring $foo is a lot different than
adding something new and strange, or dropping in some code for people
to decide how to introduce into the mainline, etc.
Are we planning that these locations are for modules, and the
kernel and assembly/assemblies will be maintained outside of this
structure?
Good questions :)
I think that assemblies should be outside, because there are lots of
interesting assemblies that people might want to do that aren't
J2EE. For example, a simple Geronimmo server (no API stakc), a
simple servlet/jsp stack, etc...
geir
Aaron
On Tue, 31 May 2005, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Can we agree that we need to somehow construct the stable, unstable
and sandbox codebases?
If so, can we move on to how?
geir
--
Geir Magnusson Jr +1-203-665-6437
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Geir Magnusson Jr +1-203-665-6437
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
