On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 04:21:21PM -0700, David Blevins wrote: > On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 11:50:43AM -0400, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: > > Can we agree that we need to somehow construct the stable, unstable > > and sandbox codebases? > > I don't think we have agreed on what is stable and what is unstable. We were > having a discussion on the fact that it is now impossible to offer a stable > upgrade/patch path for applications. That thread was killed with "PLEASE CAN > WE PUT IT ON HOLD UNTIL AFTER CERTIFICATION." > > Now Jeremy has proposed that we ignore that discussion and begin cementing > what we currently have as stable. How is that at all fair? >
Just going to throw out that I think the only goal we can all agree on is to not regress on certification once we achieve it. -David
