I vote branch now -- I'd like to see M4 go out the door. Aaron
On Fri, 8 Jul 2005, David Blevins wrote: > On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 11:23:52PM -0700, David Blevins wrote: > > We can consider as a group if we want to hold up the branch for these > > improvements [....] > > > Thoughs from the group? > > So you guys want to wait or not? Not going to make this call by myself. > > > -David > > > -David > > > > On Fri, Jul 08, 2005 at 12:45:30AM -0400, Aaron Mulder wrote: > > > Things I want to do for M4 (none of these need to hold up the branch): > > > - see if we can eliminate class names from PK Generator configuration > > > - get a release of ActiveMQ more recent than this afternoon (so our port > > > list will show the ActiveMQ port) > > > - fix the deployer to not echo your password > > > - fix the deployer to not be totally silent > > > - give the deployer a custom message for the case where RuntimeDeployer > > > is not deployed > > > - make sure exceptions propogate to the deploy tool well > > > > > > And "would be nice but don't plan to do this myself": > > > - have a sample web app set as the default so localhost:8080 doesn't 404 > > > - add a shutdown JAR, or management JAR with shutdown implemented > > > - have startup/shutdown/deploy scripts > > > - provide a bundled or linked MC4J release > > > > > > Aaron > > > > > > On Thu, 7 Jul 2005, David Blevins wrote: > > > > Alright, it's been a few days since this was proposed, going to move > > > > forward as there didn't seem to be any objections. > > > > > > > > (As a note to people who really want to get > > > > features in before we release; good! Let's > > > > release again very very soon!) > > > > > > > > > > > > If you are in the middle of something, get to the end of it quick :) > > > > > > > > If you were thinking of starting something big, wait till tomorrow at > > > > this time. > > > > > > > > If you would prefer we delay creating the branch a day or two (and > > > > have good reason for holding up the show), speak up. > > > > > > > > -David > > > > >
