Cut and run...+1 - Matt ----- Original Message ----- From: "Geir Magnusson Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, July 08, 2005 8:17 PM Subject: Re: Wait or not? Respond quick. (M4 -- 24 hour notice of branch)
> so the consensus so far is that people just want the branch to be > cut... I have no problem with that if people don't want to do any of > these for M4... > > geir > > On Jul 8, 2005, at 5:57 PM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: > > > > > On Jul 8, 2005, at 5:47 PM, David Blevins wrote: > > > > > >> On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 11:23:52PM -0700, David Blevins wrote: > >> > >> > >>> We can consider as a group if we want to hold up the branch for > >>> these > >>> improvements [....] > >>> > >>> > >> > >> > >> > >>> Thoughs from the group? > >>> > >>> > >> > >> So you guys want to wait or not? Not going to make this call by > >> myself. > >> > > > > I was just working on a note for this so I'll just do it here - I > > think driving to an M4 is a good thing, but we should agree on what > > additional stuff we're going to do and do it and then branch, or > > decide we're going to go with where we are, branch for M4 get the > > M4 out, and then try and rev an M5 quickly soon after with the > > stuff that we decided not to put in M4. > > > > Of the things I've seen and sound good and easy and good corners to > > knock off or get started to get people to contribute : > > > > - have startup/shutdown/deploy scripts > > - fix the deployer to not echo your password > > - fix the deployer to not be totally silent > > - get a release of ActiveMQ more recent than this afternoon (so > > our port > > list will show the ActiveMQ port) > > - have a sample web app set as the default so localhost:8080 > > doesn't 404 > > > > Things that sound good but I don't grok completely : > > > > - give the deployer a custom message for the case where > > RuntimeDeployer > > is not deployed > > - see if we can eliminate class names from PK Generator configuration > > - add a shutdown JAR, or management JAR with shutdown implemented > > > > Things that sound good but might be hard and take long and > > therefore be good for M5 : > > > > - make sure exceptions propogate to the deploy tool well > > - provide a bundled or linked MC4J release > > - Matt's fix for the CMP/CMR issue > > > > My $0.02 > > > > I'll also summarize our recent "Roadmap" thread and we can look at > > that for M5, Mx ... v1.0 > > > > geir > > > > -- > > Geir Magnusson Jr +1-203-665-6437 > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > -- > Geir Magnusson Jr +1-203-665-6437 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >
