On Jul 14, 2005, at 1:44 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
I support the following in order to help grow our codebase and
community (as long as we don't call it 'incubator') :
[+1] Add to geronimo/incubator/ibm-web-console; restricted committers
I support this and the more general case of "put in geronimo where
appropriate and get patches", as this is our status quo anyway :
[+1] Add to geronimo/sandbox/web-console; patches not committers
I support the following with an understanding of new committers
working in this area to start - extending trust - and have them work
with others for other parts of the codebase :
[+1] Add to geronimo/incubator/ibm-web-console; add full committers
[+1] Add to geronimo/trunk/applications/web-console; full committers
And for the rest :
[-1] Send to Apache incubator
[N/A] Other (please specify)
Thanks,
Aaron
On Thu, 14 Jul 2005, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
+1 "Other" geronimo/sandbox/web-console; no committers; use patches
-dain
On Jul 14, 2005, at 10:07 AM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
Please vote for the disposition of the IBM web console:
[ ] Add to geronimo/incubator/ibm-web-console; add full committers
[ ] Add to geronimo/incubator/ibm-web-console; restricted committers
[ ] Add to geronimo/trunk/applications/web-console; full committers
[ ] Send to Apache incubator
[ ] Other (please specify)
--
Geir Magnusson Jr +1-203-665-6437
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
