On Jul 15, 2005, at 11:18 AM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
I didn't realize this was a poll
[-1] Add to geronimo/incubator/ibm-web-console; add full committers
[-1] Add to geronimo/incubator/ibm-web-console; restricted committers
[+1] Add to geronimo/sandbox/web-console; patches not committers
[-1] Add to geronimo/trunk/applications/web-console; full committers
[+0] Send to Apache incubator
[ ] Other (please specify)
I think we have the cart before the horse on the geronimo/incubator/
* choices. We should have a discussion on how exactally this will
work and what the policies are and then vote to decide that we want
to create our own incubator inside of Geronimo.
I don't think we want to create our own incubator. it was just a
choice for the path.
For example, what exactly does "restricted" commit mean,
I thought the general understanding was commit restricted to that
part of the SVN repo.
what are the graduation criteria, and so on.
Read the last few days of discussion.
I suppose we can just crib off the incubator policies to figure
out what kind of policies are necessary (I would assume that is
would be a pure subset of the incubator rules).
It's not an incubator :)
I dislike votes that implicitly grant permission to do something we
have not discussed or more importantly voted on. Kind of like
throwing an expensive weapons system on an unrelated environmental
bill.
Boy howdy! Don't you know it...
geir
-dain
--
Geir Magnusson Jr +1-203-665-6437
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
