On Jul 31, 2005, at 8:56 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
I don't fully understand the issue, but... I think we need to
address the -1 by either changing the offending code or convincing
Dain
that he should withdraw the -1. I don't think it's a very useful
path to
allow one group of people to vote to ignore the -1 from another
person in
order to get a release out.
I know you didn't mean to, but please don't pin this on me alone.
According to David Jencks there were three -1s registered, two
"concerns" without a -1, and at the time David Jencks also registered
a -1.
Dain (-1 on behavior of toString())
David Blevins (-1 on behavior of toString(), IIUC entirely on the
basis of difficulties with openejb ids)
Alan (originally -1 on behavior of toString(), now +1)
Hiram (expressed concerns about leaking geronimo classes into
activemq. IIUC this has to do with getCanonicalName and would be
solved by an id converter)
Simone (expressed concerns about implementation complexities of
basing ObjectName implementations off of the literal string
representation. I don't think anyone proposed doing this, but I
could have missed something.)
Please don't shoot the messenger.
-dain
