On 8/17/05, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think we should consider choosing appropriate timing - it sounds
> like a big effort, and how does this fit into what we want to do w/
> M5, 1.0, etc I was going to suggest voting on even doing this, but I
> can't imagine that at *some* point in the future, we don't want to be
> on M2, so we will go there eventually. it's just a matter of when...
Is there ever an appropriate time to overhaul the build? Not really.
Is the proposed change in the best interest of the project and the
community? Yes.
Will this change be ready for release in M5? Good question ;-). I
don't think this can be determined without digging in a bit.
Are the people who have thrown their hat into the ring for working on
this effort on the hook for any M5 related work that takes a higher
priority? I'd like to get GERONIMO-693 and GERONIMO-871 tested and
committed. Only after that will I begin work on the converstion to m2.
Bruce
--
perl -e 'print unpack("u30","D0G)[EMAIL
PROTECTED]&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*"
);'
The Castor Project
http://www.castor.org/
Apache Geronimo
http://geronimo.apache.org/
