+1 These are my sentiments as well.
-dain
On Aug 22, 2005, at 7:31 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
I disagree -- I think it's important to have a common management
interface (currently, for example, NetworkConnector), and having
the same
properties called something different in every networkable GBean
totally
defeats that.
Aaron
On Mon, 22 Aug 2005, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
Jeff Genender wrote:
I am simply asking that we use a term that is not as ambiguous.
In Tomcat
land, they use the word "address" on the Connectors. Host is
referenced
throughout the plans and refers to a Host Tomcat object and a
Host GBean.
Sounds to me that Tomcat users have one set of terms, Jetty users
another, and who knows what other people use.
Rather that trying to pick one name for all which pleases none, we
should let each container configuration use terms familiar to its
users.
That way people who want Tomcat see things Tomcat-esque and people
who
want Jetty see Jetty-esque names.
This should apply to all naming: the container configuration, the
connectors/listeners, the deployment plans, the console, ...
--
Jeremy
