Can you put that comment on the JIRA issue?
I guess the question becomes, do we want the console to show all
licenses for all products that Geronimo uses, or just the licenses for the
products that the console itself requires.
Aaron
On Tue, 30 Aug 2005, Jeff Genender wrote:
> Do not remove the jar..
>
> The JDBM *is* a Geronimo dependency now...Apache Directory needs it.
>
>
>
> Aaron Mulder (JIRA) wrote:
> > [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-879?page=all ]
> >
> > Aaron Mulder updated GERONIMO-879:
> > ----------------------------------
> >
> > Fix Version: 1.0
> >
> > Currently the Geronimo repository does include JDBM:
> >
> > repository/jdbm/jars/jdbm-0.20-dev.jar
> >
> > We should probably remove the JAR and ensure it doesn't cause problems
> > before removing the license. Do you know what JDBM was used for?
> >
> >
> >
> >>The console inclusion of a license for JDBM is obsolete.
> >>--------------------------------------------------------
> >>
> >> Key: GERONIMO-879
> >> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-879
> >> Project: Geronimo
> >> Type: Bug
> >> Components: console
> >> Versions: 1.0-M5
> >> Environment: All.
> >> Reporter: Rick McGuire
> >> Priority: Minor
> >> Fix For: 1.0
> >> Attachments: jdbm.diff
> >>
> >>The about jsp page for the console includes a license link for JDBM. The
> >>JDBM component is no longer a Geronimo dependency, so this should be
> >>removed and the accompanying JDBM_license.txt file removed.
> >
> >
>
