On Oct 2, 2005, at 8:00 AM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
Cool. Can you publish a candidate installer, too?
well, I'm not sure. I see two potential problems, aside from being too
tired right now to put it together :-)
1. We aren't set up to certify it, how would we make it clear that the
installer version wasn't certified? Or is it certified??? I'd prefer
to find a way to certify the installer based version. I think it would
be easy to build the installer using maven, but I'm not sure about
unpacking/running it to get something to test. If we found a way to
make the installer include the certified zip distribution and just
unpack it and change the config.* files I don't think this would be an
issue. Maybe it's ok to claim the installer is certified if it is
built from the same assembly as the zip. I'm just not sure.
2. It's built with unreleased software that I at least couldn't get for
myself. I suppose that we could include a copy of the installer kit
version we use, as we have included a copy of axis.
Anyway I hope we can figure out a way to answer these questions so we
can put out a installer version.
thanks
david jencks
Thanks,
Aaron
On 10/2/05, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
(just making it clear for others)
+1 from me
Thanks everyone for the incredible work to make this happen.
geir
On Oct 2, 2005, at 8:15 AM, David Jencks wrote:
The 1.0-M5 branch passed all the tck tests, so David Blevins and I
have tagged geronimo and openejb and built a candidate 1.0-M5 zip.
We are running the tck on this.
The zip is available for testing at
http://people.apache.org/~dblevins/geronimo-1.0-M5.zip
We'd like to call for a vote on a release based on this tag
conditional on the tck passing (again). I think the process would
be that after the vote we would work on publishing the jars, this
zip distribution, and a source distribution.
Many thanks,
david jencks
--
Geir Magnusson Jr +1-203-665-6437
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
