Hi David, Certainly, they should be put into the main repository (via an evangelism issue). For the specs ones, these are probably older than trunk that has the poms - but I'd expect them to be the same or similar - so definitely use those. They'll still need to be uploaded.
- Brett On 11/12/05, David Jencks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Nov 11, 2005, at 11:00 AM, Prasad Kashyap wrote: > > > I'm done creating poms for the 17 modules in the attached text file. > > > > I was able to get some jars (same version and all) from the M1 > > repository. I need to track down the other jars. > > > > Next I need to figure out how to create a patch from the repository > > jars. TortoiseSVN doesn't seem to help me there. Any tips here would > > be appreciated. > > > > Should I create 1 JIRA for all these 17 modules or should each module > > have it's own JIRA ? > > > > Cheers > > Prasad > > > > > > > I'm worried that duplicate work is happening. The geronimo-specs > already have an m2 build so I would think they all have valid m2 poms. > I believe jeff genender has valid activemq poms from his work with > wadi. > > I certainly don't know what should happen with these poms now that they > exist. I don't think keeping them private to geronimo is likely to be > the best practice. Should we open one issue/pom in maven evangelism? > Jason? Brett? > > thanks > david jencks > >
