-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Bruce Snyder wrote, On 1/5/2006 3:43 PM: > On 1/5/06, Alan D. Cabrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>It's my understading that we're going for JEE 5. I think that our >>re-arch of security should go into that as well. > > > Agreed. > > >>How do we want to stage this effort in terms of SVN organization? When >>should we cut a 2.0 development branch? > > > I suppose that the JEE 5 work would be best suited to a 2.0 branch. > That means that there is a potential to have to do a lot of double > work. What I mean to say is that any new innovations being committed > to the HEAD will need to be refactored and committed to the 2.0 > branch. And this work will increase more with the addition of more > branches (e.g., 1.1, 1.2, etc.).
You touched on the concern that I had. I'm thinking that once we cut this, there will be no further work on 1.x, because everyone will want to work on 2.x. Regards, Alan -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFDvba11xC6qnMLUpYRAuAEAJ9c0uQDLeGgIzcqqR/iKv2l99QC5wCdGhVB foYWLFogfXXWxoMY/OEXtI8= =zGE8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
