On 1/5/06, Alan D. Cabrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>How do we want to stage this effort in terms of SVN organization? When
> >>should we cut a 2.0 development branch?
> >
> >
> > I suppose that the JEE 5 work would be best suited to a 2.0 branch.
> > That means that there is a potential to have to do a lot of double
> > work. What I mean to say is that any new innovations being committed
> > to the HEAD will need to be refactored and committed to the 2.0
> > branch. And this work will increase more with the addition of more
> > branches (e.g., 1.1, 1.2, etc.).
>
> You touched on the concern that I had. I'm thinking that once we cut
> this, there will be no further work on 1.x, because everyone will want
> to work on 2.x.
Then we should probably consider making a decision that the HEAD
should contain 2.x work only. If any fixes need to be done to the 1.x
code then proper branching and tagging should occur to facilitate that
work.
Bruce
--
perl -e 'print unpack("u30","D0G)[EMAIL
PROTECTED]&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*"
);'
Apache Geronimo (http://geronimo.apache.org/)
