Re: Replication using totem protocol

[lichtner]

Well, you guys let me know if I can help you in any way.

> I think there is a time and place for this and can be leveraged in other
> protocols.  As a minimum it can be a pluggable protocol.  Its a great
> start.
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>> Given the inherent over head in total order protocols, I think we
>>> should work to limit the messages passed over the protocol, to only
>>> the absolute minimum to make our cluster work reliably.
>>> Specifically, I think this is only the distributed lock.  For state
>>> replication we can use a much more efficient tcp or udp based protocol.
>>
>> As I said, if your workload has low data sharing (e.g. session
>> replication), you should not use totem. It's designed for systems where
>> _each_ processor needs _most_ of the messages.
>>
>>
>>
>