[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Well, you guys let me know if I can help you in any way.
Keep on talking ;-) > >> I think there is a time and place for this and can be leveraged in other >> protocols. As a minimum it can be a pluggable protocol. Its a great >> start. >> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >>>> Given the inherent over head in total order protocols, I think we >>>> should work to limit the messages passed over the protocol, to only >>>> the absolute minimum to make our cluster work reliably. >>>> Specifically, I think this is only the distributed lock. For state >>>> replication we can use a much more efficient tcp or udp based protocol. >>> As I said, if your workload has low data sharing (e.g. session >>> replication), you should not use totem. It's designed for systems where >>> _each_ processor needs _most_ of the messages. >>> >>> >>> >
