On 27 Jan 2006, at 18:54, Jules Gosnell wrote:
James Strachan wrote:
On 27 Jan 2006, at 18:20, Jules Gosnell wrote:
Dain,
David is talking about how SessionManagers (effectively extended
SessionFactories) should be plumbed into Geronimo (i.e. GBeans),
not about the API's describing Sessions themselves.
I've looked at the stuff in modules/session - it looks very
similar to some WADI internals - there is loads of overlap
here. I have some serious plans for converging WADI with
ActiveSpace and would be happy to consider further changes to
reuse or contribute to your sessions module. We should talk.
I'll jot my ideas down and post them shortly.
How about just implementing the Session APi directly using WADI? :)
That's something that we could look at. I'd be interested to hear
you plans for actually integrating the sessions with some container
(web, ejb, etc...) as well - WADI is already doing this.
WADI is doing this for web only; the Session API is designed as a
client API to use for OpenEJB, Lingo, ServiceMix, Tuscany et al. i.e.
the containers would use the API directly.
Did you have a route in mind ?
See http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/trunk/modules/session/
src/java/org/apache/geronimo/session/package.html
or if you've a sucky email program
http://tinyurl.com/b4mly
James
-------
http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
