Then start the BPEL project under Geronimo. *NOT* under ServiceMix. -- dims
On 2/3/06, James Strachan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 3 Feb 2006, at 15:08, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote: > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > James Strachan wrote: > >> > >> Incidentally its worth looking at other projects at Apache like Agila > >> and various projects on http://ws.apache.org like EWS, Mirae, Muse, > >> WSRF, TSIK etc which are kinda quiet, some near dormant. > > > > No, it is not worth looking at them, if the intent is to use > > them as precedents of a process some are finding objectionable. > > Saying, 'They did it so why can't we?' is not appropriate. > > I guess I didn't explain myself well there at all Ken sorry. (I'm > full of cold :( ). > I was just trying to say I'd rather see large, successful communities > form first, then if need be parts of the project are split off if > they become so wildly successful by themselves. So I was trying to > show some examples of projects which maybe could have benefited from > starting inside a larger, less granular project/community first > rather than starting small and dwindling then being merged back > together again due to inactivity. > > e.g. both Geronimo and Jakarta Commons have a broad range of > components inside them - many of which are reusable by themselves - > in both cases the courser grained projects helped grow a larger more > diverse community IMHO. > > James > ------- > http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/ > > -- Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/
