On Feb 14, 2006, at 8:32 PM, Bruce Snyder wrote:
1) It seems like the name-key elements should be wrapped in another
element. Perhaps an element named name-pattern or something similar.
Maybe we just make these generic properties:
<properties>
<property>
<name>domain</name>
<value>geronimo.maven</value>
</property>
<property>
<name>J2EEServer</name>
<value>geronimo</value>
</property>
</properties>
On Feb 15, 2006, at 5:13 AM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
The biggest change I'd request is to take the Id of the end of group
and artifact. I don't think it adds anything, and it makes it harder
to read and repeat (is that Id or ld, for example). If we really have
to keep it, I'd prefer artifact-id and group-id, but I really don't
see why we shouldn't just use group, type, artifact, and version.
If we are going with maven style dependencies I think we should
follow their xml (http://maven.apache.org/maven-model/maven.html) as
close as possible. If we are going to split from their format, I
would like the difference to not be subtle, which would rule out
dropping just the Id and reusing elements named "scope" or "type" for
something other than what they mean in maven.
-dain
