comments inlne.... --- Prasad Kashyap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jacek, > > From the existing top level pom that we now have in > the trunk, only 2 > modules fail a top down build. (This is after you > apply the patch for > directory > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1717) > > The 2 modules having issues are security and > j2ee-schema. > The security module requires that no test kenrnel should be running. This happens if there was a test failure in the system module, it leaves a running kernel behind. It also requires the <systemProperties>. j2ee-schema requires a modification to xmlbeans-maven-plugin (may be there is another way) to accept catalogLocation. Without this none of the builders can be expected to work correctly. > For now, we need to skip tests for security. Is it > still correct that > a later surefire plugin or maven releases will fix > it for us ? > As Jacek said using <version>2.1.3-SNAPSHOT</version> for surefire plugin solved the systemProperties problem. May be it has not made it to the svn. I have not tested system module today. It was the cause of most failures 2 days ago. > For the j2ee-schema, we still don't know what the > problem is. I had a > conversation with David Jencks last evening, the > gist of which can be > seen in the JIRA comments. If nobody is looking at > this, I can own > this piece. Anita ? Henri ? The xmlbeans-maven-plugin needs to be modified to accept catalogLocation. Ant tasks in j2ee-builder and connector-builder module need to be migrated. Currently the tests have been disabled in pom.xml. Please feel free to pick one! :). Thanks Anita > > Here's my next concern. For these modules that have > migrated to m2, we > should include them in the daily G builds as soon as > possible. If we > don't pull out the m1 build artifacts, project.xml > and maven.xml from > the migrated modules, then there's a chance that > those may get changed > behind our backs while we go forward converting > more. There might be a > regression of issues. > > Cheers > Prasad. > > On 3/9/06, Jacek Laskowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > 2006/3/8, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > I thought it was going to be an easy fix, adding > > > System.getProperty("basedir"), but it doesn't > actually use something > > > local, it uses the /tmp. So I'm also looking at > having it be > > > target/dbderby, I'm not sure why it needs to be > in tmp anyway. > > > > I was thinking along these lines, when suddenly > Prasad sorted it out > > so easy. Check it out and think how easy it was. > I'm not sure if it > > wasn't me who might've suggested it's something > with target. If it's > > me, please accept my appologies ;) > > > > > Hen > > > > Jacek > > > > -- > > Jacek Laskowski > > http://www.laskowski.org.pl > > > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
