David Blevins wrote:
On Mar 17, 2006, at 2:18 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Jacek Laskowski wrote:
2006/3/17, Prasad Kashyap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
This will make our top level pom.xml a huge big list. Are we sure
we want to keep it structured this way ?
Hi Prasad, It looks that we're quickly approaching Dave's idea when
he had envisioned the modules listed in one place would require a
lot of effort to maintain. I personally don't think we have since
lost the time as I couldn't see it the first time while having read
Dave's email. Now, we're finally more experienced to get the gist of
what he was saying ;) I'm for changing the parent pom to include
only a few modules with a few more submodules rather than keeping
them all in it. If it doesn't work we can always restructure it
again ;) Any comments before the change appears?
Maybe the members of the children POMs' group ids could be named:
org.apache.geronimo.applications
org.apache.geronimo.modules
Etc.
Would you then move all the code inside to the same package, as in
org.apache.geronimo.modules.kernel or
org.apache.geronimo.applications.daytrader?
-David
I don't think that this is necessary but, it could be handy.
Regards,
Alan
