Re: I think groupIds in m2 build need improvement

[Dain Sundstrom]

I find it a PITA when the groupId doesn't match the Java package name  
for jar files.  For modules (FKA configs), I don't have any opinion.   
For assemblies, I think we should use o.a.g.

-dain
On Jun 5, 2006, at 2:19 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:

o.a.g.modules (formerly called configs)
o.a.g.xxx (formerly called modules)
o.a.g.plugins
o.a.g.assemblies
o.a.g.applications
o.a.g.specs (has been in use for a while now)

I think this is reasonable for the code-base as it exists now.

--jason