On 6/7/06, Christoph Sturm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
try http://svn.activemq.codehaus.org/

Nope.  First, I assume that committers don't use HTTP.  Second, that's
Fisheye, and if you point SVN to it, you get

svn: PROPFIND request failed on '/'
svn: PROPFIND of '/': 501
Method+PROPFIND+is+not+defined+in+RFC+2068+and+is+not+supported+by+the+Servlet+API+
(http://svn.activemq.codehaus.org)

Thanks,
   Aaron

On 6/6/06, Aaron Mulder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What's the best way to get the ActiveMQ 3.2.4 code?
>
> I tried to update
> 
svn+ssh://svn.activemq.codehaus.org/svnroot/activemq/branches/activemq-3/activemq
> and it didn't take my password (even the one that beaver.codehaus.org
> says is my new SVN password).
>
> Then I tried to check out
> svn+ssh://svn.activemq.org/scm/activemq/branches/activemq-3/activemq
> and it doesn't prompt for a password and doesn't let me on with my
> public key.
>
> Thanks,
>     Aaron
>
> On 6/6/06, Hiram Chirino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I resolved 1, and commented on the other issue.
> >
> > On 6/6/06, Paul McMahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Just wanted to send a reminder that there are a couple of patches
> > > waiting to be applied to AMQ 3.2.4 that address problems with creating
> > > connectors from the console.
> > >
> > > https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-727
> > > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1451
> > >
> > > Actually, it's possible they have been applied without closing the
> > > JIRAs but I wasn't able to connect to svn.activemq.org to check.
> > >
> > >
> > > Best wishes,
> > > Paul
> > >
> > >
> > > On 6/5/06, Matt Hogstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Hiram / James,
> > > >
> > > > Currently we are running off 3.2.4-SNAPSHOT.  Can you release an 
official version?  I'd like to get
> > > > the official G RC out tomorrow.
> > > >
> > > > thanks
> > > >
> > > > Matt
> > > >
> > > > Hiram Chirino wrote:
> > > > > Howdy Folks,
> > > > >
> > > > > I was planing to work on a patch that takes that gbean related modules
> > > > > in ActiveMQ puts them in
> > > > > geronimo.  I just wanted to make sure that there are no objections to
> > > > > this.  Those gbean modules are mostly just gbean related glue code
> > > > > which I think make more sense living in Geronimo.  No one else outside
> > > > > of the geronimo project is interested in the activemq gbean modules.
> > > > >
> > > > > Once that part is done, then I'll start to work on merging/modifying
> > > > > the port to activemq 4.x that was done the 1.2-dead branch.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Regards,
> > Hiram
> >
>


--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to