+1, looks fine to me. The sooner Geronimo moves to Apache ActiveMQ the better IMHO
On 6/8/06, Hiram Chirino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So in terms the of the RTC process, is this RTC patch dead since it did not get the 3 +1's I kinda would have preferred to get some -1's instead of not getting any comments on the patch. Is it that there are not enough folks that are interested in the activemq integration aspects of geronimo? Regards, Hiram On 6/6/06, Hiram Chirino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > m2 poms are included in the patch. But for some reason the current m2 > build does not seem to let you run mvn from a submodule, some > dependency variables do not get evaluated. weird. > > On 6/5/06, David Jencks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Jun 5, 2006, at 4:19 PM, Hiram Chirino wrote: > > > > > Howdy folks, > > > > > > Here's a patch that brings in the activemq gbean modules into > > > geronimo. It's partly what was in activemq 4.x and integrated into > > > geronimo 1.2-dead merged with the changes in the 3.x branch. > > > > > > It compiles at least and looks like a reasonable start. Once further > > > integration work gets done we may need to tweak a little more. here's > > > my +1 got get this committed. I guess I just need 3 more. > > > > > > > I'd find it a lot easier to review, apply, and test this patch if you > > attached it to a jira entry. > > > > Is there any chance of you coming up with a pom.xml for the m2 build? > > > > thanks > > david jencks > > > > > > > -- > Regards, > Hiram > -- Regards, Hiram
-- James ------- http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
