Bah... handy smandy :-P --jason
On Jun 12, 2006, at 6:11 AM, James Strachan wrote:
On 6/12/06, Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> Sounds like a great idea for the individual specs. How is the uber-> jar going to be handled? Will it be re-released/reversioned > whenever any of the specs reversion, or only at some major release > boundary? Why do we need any spec uber-jar?Having a single jar for j2ee is very handy. -- James ------- http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
