On Jun 12, 2006, at 1:16 PM, Hernan Cunico wrote:
Yeah, SandBox was the most representative name I could come up with
at that time, not necessarily the best ;-)
I would prefer to keep the geronimo space as a the router to all
our content. In fact I created that space as a consequence of not
being able to create a TOC (consolidating all entries) outside
confluence.
I'll be happy to migrate the SandBox space to any other name we may
want. However, I would say that if we use the geronimo space to add/
develop content we will end up loosing the organization we are
trying to achieve. I think we should have a separated space
(SandBox), maybe with a more appealing name, to hold "everything
else". Thoughts?
I see your concerns and share them, but don't see how having a space
amounting to "uncategorized" eliminates disorganization. I just see
it being confusing as most people's first inclination will be to
document general Geronimo stuff that's not version specific in the
GERONIMO space.
It's also pretty trivial to move documents.
-David
Cheers!
Hernan
David Blevins wrote:
Hi Hernan,
All looks pretty great. One comment below.
On Jun 7, 2006, at 2:29 PM, Hernan Cunico wrote:
The last section should hold "everything else", this section
will be a good place to put the historical and/or still valid
data from the old wiki that does not fit in any of the other
spaces.
1. Apache Geronimo v1.0
Apache Geronimo v1.0 - User's Guide
Apache Geronimo v1.0 - Developer's Guide
2. Apache Geronimo v1.1
Apache Geronimo v1.1 - User's Guide
3. Apache Geronimo Project Management
Apache Geronimo Development Process
Apache Geronimo Development Status
4. Apache Geronimo SandBox
Not sure if this organization calls for a vote but is pretty
close to what we have been discussing from the beginning for
organizing the documentation.
Not a big fan of a SandBox space (GMOxSBOX) and would prefer just
use the GERONIMO space for "everything else."
-David
