I've noticed some problems (and differences between our Tomcat and Jetty assemblies) when attempting to deploy the same application more than once without a plan (hence using a generated version). What are the expected results when this is done either by accident or deliberately to install a newer version of an application? My thinking is that we should do 1 of 2 things: 1) warn the user that they are attempting to deploy another version and require some type of confirmation before proceeding. 2) deploy so long as it is a newer version and ensure that the newest version is the one that we start/run. I assume that if it is an older version we should always fail the deploy and warn the user but I guess that's just a matter of opinion as well. I haven't tried this scenario but my guess is that we don't currently do any version checking at all and would get the same results that I'm seeing with newer versions.

Here is what I'm observing:

Jetty:
- The second deploy succeeds without error. All instances of the deployed application are marked as "running" when viewed either in the web console of via the list-modules command and all share the same url. It's not clear to me which instance of the application is actually servicing the requests. Both the command line and the web console deploy result in messages indicating that the application was successfully deployed.

Tomcat:
- The second deploy fails with a NPE on the server. I've opened http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1700 for this problem. When doing the deploy from the command line, a number of exceptions are displayed to the user (life-cycle exception, Illegal arg exception on doStart, etc...). When doing the deployment from the web console the typical success message is returned with no mention of any errors. The net result in the system is that multiple instances of the application are deployed but only the original is started and running.


Joe

--
Joe Bohn
joe.bohn at earthlink.net

"He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep, to gain what he cannot lose." -- Jim Elliot

Reply via email to