John Sisson wrote:
I'd also be interested in calling in, preferably closer to 9:00pm if
possible.
http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meetingtime.html?day=29&month=6&year=2006&p1=78&p2=240&p3=137&p4=179
John
Guys,
Covalent had to commit to a time - we went for 6:00pm on thursday.
I realise that this may be a little earlier than some of you were hoping
for, but it was the best we could do at short notice - sorry.
One further problem. We were not able to organise conferencing
facilities. If anyone thinks that they can work around this, perhaps via
skype or something, I would be happy to try to set something up - Has
anyone run a skype conference with 4 or 5 participants before ? Would
you like us to try?
Jules
Jules Gosnell wrote:
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
I was planning on attending the CeltiXFire BOF at 2100 Dublin time.
2200 is good from my perspective.
That's a little later than I was hoping for - my worry would be that
people who might otherwise be there will have packed up and gone home
by then.
I would rather a slot somewhere between 6:00pm and 9:00pm...
How does that sound ?
Jules
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
Evening you time would be best for me. It looks like there is an 8
hour time diff between Dublin and California, so anything after 6pm
your time would be good for me (10am here). I can go maybe an hour
earlier, but then I will be sleepy.
-dain
On Jun 27, 2006, at 1:31 PM, Jules Gosnell wrote:
Jeff Genender wrote:
Jules Gosnell wrote:
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
Are you going to provide a call in line so people not at the
conference can participate?
I'll look into it.
Would anyone be interested in using such a feature ?
I would likely be interested too depending on time.
OK, Jeff - so are there any windows on thurs aft/eve (dublin time)
which would not suit you ? Let us know, so that we can avoid them.
Jules
Jules
-dain
On Jun 27, 2006, at 10:48 AM, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
Jules Gosnell wrote:
Matt - I don't think that the problem was with sponsorship,
but rather
exclusion... (maybe I've misunderstood something?). Covalent
are simply
providing a room and beer. The invitation is open to the entire
community and you will be driving the meeting.
That should be cool. Firstly, it has been announced here in the
public list. Secondly, you should consider putting up a few
notice signs around ApacheCon to catch interested people who
didn't see this.
Yes, exclusion and lack of openness was the issue. The sponsorship
was mud in the water. By mentioning this here the issue is
rendered
nonexistent.
Of course, you need to post (here and on those paper notices) the
details, such as time and place, as soon as they're figured out.
Thanks, Jules. And thanks for raising this, Matt, so it can be
clarified a bit.
--
#ken P-)}
Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini http://Ken.Coar.Org/
Author, developer, opinionist http://Apache-Server.Com/
"Millennium hand and shrimp!"
--"Open Source is a self-assembling organism. You dangle a piece of
string into a super-saturated solution and a whole operating-system
crystallises out around it."
/**********************************
* Jules Gosnell
* Partner
* Core Developers Network (Europe)
*
* www.coredevelopers.net
*
* Open Source Training & Support.
**********************************/
