Re: [VOTE] Sponsor OpenEJB to become sub-project of Geronimo

[Jason Dillon]

It should be more than possible to have a decoupled OpenEJB codebase that plugs into Geronimo while at the same time have these projects exists in the same community. --jason On Jul 2, 2006, at 11:54 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote: I also am leaning towards the idea that it's good for OpenEJB to be separate from Geronimo.  Whenever I talk w/ users of OpenEJB, they are always concerned about its close association w/ Geronimo.  However, it is my understanding that Dain is working hard on decoupling OpenEJB's strong reliance on Geronimo code. Regards, Alan Mohammed Nour wrote: Hi All...   +1, but I have a question. Isn't it better to have OEJB as a separate project, as we have the intention to make it independent from Geronimo, as to have it work inside or outside Geronimo?   On 12/3/05, David Blevins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The OpenEJB committers have discussed it and voted to be become a Geronimo sub-project.  The incubator proposl is here: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenEjbProposal Please vote if you'd like Geronimo to be the sponsor of OpenEJB during incubation [ ] +1 = I support the move to sponsor OpenEJB during incubation as a sub-project of Geronimo [ ] +0 = I don't mind either way [ ] -1 = I don't support this move because: _______________ +1 from me -- David