-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Matt Hogstrom wrote: > I do not believe the +1's need to be from PMC members but other > committers. This is a snippet from Ken's personal web page: > > "Consequently, acting ex officio my VP/chair of Apache Geronimo role, > yesterday (Sunday, 21 May 2006) I changed the project's development > model from CTR (Commit-Then-Review) to RTC (Review-Then-Commit). This > means that all code changes that aren't to documentation or specific > bug fixes must be proposed to the development list as patches, and > three *[other] committers* need to verify them and vote in favour of > them before they can be applied to the code in the repository. (This > doesn't apply to the sandboxes and experimental areas, only the main > lines and branches of development.)" > > In Ken's original e-mail the vote required three other committers and > not specifically PMC members.
I was mistaken. See http://www.apache.org/foundation/glossary#Vote If all committers are on the PMC, the distinction vanishes -- but we do not have that situation. I apologise for the confusion. - -- #ken P-|} Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini http://Ken.Coar.Org/ Author, developer, opinionist http://Apache-Server.Com/ "Millennium hand and shrimp!" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iQCVAwUBRKvwmprNPMCpn3XdAQKPBAP/f9gq3fnJ/mL1mKC0yUwm84z4RDUa2Ts4 C/a8Kgc25BiIS6YNCCvAPYN1e0WDMpCtNEa6m7sgeel9xytjYm9ZKFaVZ+P4nMts FTcgdR8quFv7TZpMfCd/hbOPUujRF8/aHlr8sqJI0/wGA2lgJHdooo6tx3H/8ROC TLFdg1lQns8= =f5Hn -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
