-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 David Jencks wrote: > > I do not think that Ken is providing sufficient communication to the > dev list. As matt pointed out, the original edict to the dev list > and ken's blog entry clearly and unequivocally stated that committer > votes were binding for commit decisions.
As I just mentioned in another reply, I was mistaken. See http://www.apache.org/foundation/glossary#Vote > Sometime later ken appears > to have commmented on this policy with an interpretation that is > radically different from the original very clear statement with an > comment deep in a thread. Personally I find that rather ambiguous. Appropriately so. I failed to explain the reason for the change. I apologise. > Not to insult any pmc members, but it appears that this is an issue > on which the PMC has absolutely no input. Not correct. > As such, it is difficult > for me to trust comments on this issue from anyone other than Ken. Trust, or consider authoritative? - -- #ken P-|} Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini http://Ken.Coar.Org/ Author, developer, opinionist http://Apache-Server.Com/ "Millennium hand and shrimp!" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iQCVAwUBRKvxpJrNPMCpn3XdAQIebQQAw7VDI+nrjo3+pevHC03I7Oj8GnsifTDd 2OzEulM1M/7Y9tdDw+TBaV5QMgFd1pt2U+p2zFZBPs7wOn4kl6bAc+WVSX765mil uRKr56I58ewGrsqCv/SpTbpNexzFRHewsR8cx7jus3ByjC5Bc13sHwHiLEhLTsA6 8BhX7UEtIVA= =qA23 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
