Re: [Vote] Geronimo Eclipse Plugin v1.1.0

Mon, 10 Jul 2006 18:41:28 -0700

Ok thanks, but a license is not needed for the update site zip as this is handled by the update manager.  As far as the deployable plugin the licenses only need to be packaged within the features and not each individual plugin.

On Jul 10, 2006, at 8:21 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:

Sachin,
I'm afraid I don't see either a NOTICE or LICENSE files in the plugin zip file, itself, nor any of the embedded jar files. They all must contain both LICENSE and NOTICE files. Afraid this is a <hard> requirement. And you'll need to create new binaries... See http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#what-must-every-release-contain for more information.

We should be able to reuse some of the license information we generated for G 1.1. I'm happy to help with that. I'm not sure how we're putting the NOTICE and LICENSE info in each of the jar files. Shouldn't be too hard to figure out, but perhaps someone can chime in...

--kevan

On Jul 9, 2006, at 4:24 PM, Sachin Patel wrote:

The following distributions of the Geronimo Eclipse plugin are ready to be voted on for final release.  Since binding votes are needed, each PMC member if possible, please cast your vote within 72 hours.


Here is my +1.

- sachin



-sachin

Reply via email to