The bootstrap on linux first failed a test in the security module. I ran the build inside the security module. It passed successfully.
Then I ran bootstrap again. It failed while transferring an artifact. Now I'm running mvn from top level. This is running. Keeping my fingers crossed Prasad On 7/14/06, Prasad Kashyap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I tried the latest changes on Windows and it builds the assembly fine. I even ran the jetty binary successfully. Jason, I also tried commenting out a few builders from the dependencies list and it still worked fine. So I guess we can prune the deps list to remove the redudant ones. A full extract and bootstrap on Linux is running. Cheers Prasad On 7/14/06, Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It looks like the Maven 2 peeps are not going to be able to take in > our patches to apply to the assembly plugin, which provides mappers > and some includes/excludes to unpack and a permission related fix to > files/file element processing. > > I believe that those changes will eventually make it in, but for now > to get around the need Prasad and I talked about using the dependency > plugin and the antrun plugin to perform the needed "flattening" of > the schema files for the /schema/* in the assembly. > > I've implemented this already for the geronimo-jetty-j2ee assembly in > the svkmerge/m2migration branch. > > It appears to function as expected. I've disabled the remaining > assemblies which have not yet been converted. Once they have been > converted they will be re-enabled. > > Note, we are still using car:installConfigs... but we no longer need > to have MASSEMBLY-45 or MASSEMBLY-127 applied to a custom 2.2- > SNAPSHOT version of the maven-assembly-plugin to build out assemblies. > > The full conversation is here if anyone is interested: > > http://uwyn.com/drone/log/bevinbot/geronimo/20060714 > > Starts with '19:53 <jdillon> any thoughts on using dependency + > antrun to setup the right bits and then use the 2.1 assembly plugin?' > --jason >
