On 8/12/06, Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Can you point me at the build for one of these external plugins?

OK, first check out and build the prerequisite:

https://svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/gplugins/common/trunk

Then check out and build

https://svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/gplugins/quartz/trunk

There are several modules in that one, it should build base/scheduler,
base/deployer, and base/console (the JAR/WAR artifacts) and then
plugins/scheduler (the first CAR artifact which makes a CAR out of the
base/scheduler JAR).

It's the plugins/scheduler build I'm testing with, which I want to
create a CAR file with embedded META-INF/geronimo-plugin.xml file.

On the trunk build, I did the clean, and the build is going now.  If
it works, I'll look at the output for the welcome app CAR.

Thanks,
    Aaron

On Aug 12, 2006, at 8:05 AM, Aaron Mulder wrote:

> Another issue...
>
> When I run the car-maven-plugin on an external plugin, the execution
> fails because the internal deployment can't resolve a dependency (say,
> geronimo-security).  This can't be listed as a dependency in the POM
> because we don't want it to be written into the target plan.  But it
> has to be in the M2 repository for the car-maven-plugin to work.
>
> My solution so far is to add a bunch of extraneous dependencies to the
> module that builds the service JAR in the first place, where the
> plugin module is separate and builds a plugin out of the service JAR.
>
> The problem is, there are a *lot* of these dependencies.  For a simple
> service plugin that depends only on geronimo-gbean-deployer being
> listed for the car-maven-plugin, I've run into these and I'm still
> going (you disover them one build failure at a time):
>
> - geronimo-core
> - geronimo-transaction
> - geronimo-security
> - geronimo-util
> - geronimo-webservices
> - howl-logger
>
> I don't know what the right way to do this is, but I'd really like it
> if something under the covers caused all the necessary dependencies to
> be downloaded so I don't have to clutter up my build with all this
> stuff.  (web services?!?)  I'm tempted to create a dummy build with
> all these dependencies that you run once just to suck all the stuff
> into your repo and I can leave it out of my real build.
>
> Thanks,
>     Aaron
>
> On 8/12/06, Aaron Mulder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Uh-oh.
>>
>> I updated and tried to build just the car-maven-plugin and it failed
>> with a compile error.
>>
>> So I ran a full "./build" and it failed with a test error -- some
>> TransactionContextManager test which I would have thought was
>> obsolete.
>>
>> Anyway, I ran a "./build -Dmaven.test.skip=true" and it got further,
>> but failed in the first config, which I expect means something isn't
>> quite right with the car-maven-plugin.  Results below.  It seems to
>> fail on building the GBean deployer, complaining that the GBean
>> deployer already exists.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>      Aaron
>>
>> [INFO]
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> -------
>> [INFO] Building Geronimo :: Configs
>> [INFO]    task-segment: [install]
>> [INFO]
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> -------
>> [INFO] [site:attach-descriptor]
>> [INFO] [install:install]
>> [INFO] Installing /data/cvs/geronimo/configs/pom.xml to
>> /home/ammulder/.m2/repository/org/apache/geronimo/configs/configs/
>> 1.2-SNAPSHOT/configs-1.2-SNAPSHOT.pom
>> [INFO]
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> -------
>> [INFO] Building Geronimo Configs :: GBean Deployer
>> [INFO]    task-segment: [install]
>> [INFO]
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> -------
>> ...
>> [INFO] [car:prepare-plan]
>> [INFO] Generated: /data/cvs/geronimo/configs/geronimo-gbean-
>> deployer/target/plan
>> [INFO] [car:package]
>> Packaging configuration
>> /data/cvs/geronimo/configs/geronimo-gbean-deployer/target/plan/
>> plan.xml
>> ERROR [PackageBuilder]
>> org.apache.geronimo.common.DeploymentException:
>> Module org.apache.geronimo.configs/geronimo-gbean-deployer/1.2-
>> SNAPSHOT/car
>> already exists in the server.  Try to undeploy it first or use the
>> redeploy command.
>> org.apache.geronimo.common.DeploymentException: Module
>> org.apache.geronimo.configs/geronimo-gbean-deployer/1.2-SNAPSHOT/car
>> already exists in the server.  Try to undeploy it first or use the
>> redeploy command.
>>         at org.apache.geronimo.deployment.Deployer.deploy
>> (Deployer.java:254)
>>         at org.apache.geronimo.deployment.Deployer$
>> $FastClassByCGLIB$$734a235d.invoke(<generated>)
>>         at net.sf.cglib.reflect.FastMethod.invoke(FastMethod.java:53)
>>         at
>> org.apache.geronimo.gbean.runtime.FastMethodInvoker.invoke
>> (FastMethodInvoker.java:38)
>>         at org.apache.geronimo.gbean.runtime.GBeanOperation.invoke
>> (GBeanOperation.java:122)
>>         at org.apache.geronimo.gbean.runtime.GBeanInstance.invoke
>> (GBeanInstance.java:852)
>>         at org.apache.geronimo.kernel.basic.BasicKernel.invoke
>> (BasicKernel.java:239)
>>         at
>> org.apache.geronimo.plugin.car.PackageBuilder.invokeDeployer
>> (PackageBuilder.java:510)
>>         at org.apache.geronimo.plugin.car.PackageBuilder.execute
>> (PackageBuilder.java:346)
>>         at
>> org.apache.geronimo.plugin.car.PackageMojo.executePackageBuilderShell
>> (PackageMojo.java:253)
>>         at org.apache.geronimo.plugin.car.PackageMojo.doExecute
>> (PackageMojo.java:182)
>>         at org.apache.geronimo.plugin.MojoSupport.execute
>> (MojoSupport.java:42)
>>         at org.apache.maven.plugin.DefaultPluginManager.executeMojo
>> (DefaultPluginManager.java:412)
>>         at
>> org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor.executeGoals
>> (DefaultLifecycleExecutor.java:534)
>>         at
>> org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor.executeGoalWithLi
>> fecycle(DefaultLifecycleExecutor.java:475)
>>         at
>> org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor.executeGoal
>> (DefaultLifecycleExecutor.java:454)
>>         at
>> org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor.executeGoalAndHan
>> dleFailures(DefaultLifecycleExecutor.java:306)
>>         at
>> org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor.executeTaskSegmen
>> ts(DefaultLifecycleExecutor.java:273)
>>         at
>> org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor.execute
>> (DefaultLifecycleExecutor.java:140)
>>         at org.apache.maven.DefaultMaven.doExecute
>> (DefaultMaven.java:322)
>>         at org.apache.maven.DefaultMaven.execute(DefaultMaven.java:
>> 115)
>>         at org.apache.maven.cli.MavenCli.main(MavenCli.java:256)
>>         at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native
>> Method)
>>         at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke
>> (NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
>>         at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke
>> (DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
>>         at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:324)
>>         at org.codehaus.classworlds.Launcher.launchEnhanced
>> (Launcher.java:315)
>>         at org.codehaus.classworlds.Launcher.launch(Launcher.java:
>> 255)
>>         at org.codehaus.classworlds.Launcher.mainWithExitCode
>> (Launcher.java:430)
>>         at org.codehaus.classworlds.Launcher.main(Launcher.java:375)
>> 09:59:15,785 ERROR [PackageBuilder]
>> org.apache.geronimo.common.DeploymentException: Module
>> org.apache.geronimo.configs/geronimo-gbean-deployer/1.2-SNAPSHOT/car
>> already exists in the server.  Try to undeploy it first or use the
>> redeploy command.
>>
>>
>>
>> On 8/12/06, Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > I've just finished committing changes that should (I hope) bring
>> back
>> > the functionality needed to include geronimo-plugin.xml... someone
>> > please validate that it works as desired.
>> >
>> > Maven is now responsible for making the car archives now... the car
>> > plugin will always spit out into a local repo and then the
>> > PackageMojo will create an archive out of it using the m2 archiver
>> > bits, which allows flexible manifest entries... blah blah.
>> >
>> > geronimo-plugin.xml is still being filtered using the resources
>> > plugin... and really anything you drop into src/main/resources will
>> > be included into the car, and filtering is controlled by the
>> default
>> > m2 bits in your pom.
>> >
>> > Plan files have been updated to use ${pom.version} instead of $
>> > {pom.currentVersion}... ${pom} is actually the project reference,
>> > which is closer to what it would be if filtered by resources (which
>> > we will eventually get to, and drop velocity).
>> >
>> > Car files now all have LICENSE.txt and NOTICE.txt included (side-
>> > effect of using Maven's mech to pick up resources), blah blah
>> >
>> > The addition of the startup-jar is no longer hidden... its just
>> > another resources in src/main/resources.
>> >
>> > I also updated the PackageBuilder to take a list of classpath
>> > elements (that are artifacts, like the dependency plugin) which
>> > allows for customization of the prefix added to the entry in the
>> > manifest, which was needed to get lib/endorsed bits (the m2
>> archiver
>> > only allows one prefix per set).  Right now the list is non-
>> > transitive... I could not figure how to get that working... need to
>> > ping the peeps in #maven for help.  I will be pruning the list of
>> > properties we have in the root pom to manage versions, which are
>> > mostly unused now.
>> >
>> > There is still some more dependency clean up that needs to be done,
>> > but the servers are starting fine.
>> >
>> > Please take a moment and check for any strangeness and lemme
>> know if
>> > you find anything.
>> >
>> > May still be a bit more work to get the multiple car muck
>> working...
>> > but until I have something that is actually using the plugin that I
>> > can peek at I can't really fix it.
>> >
>> > I left the Deployer code asis... though my hunch is that some of
>> this
>> > is not needed (the jar and manifest bits primarily)... and if
>> someone
>> > knows if we use those bits anywhere else please speak up, else we
>> > should drop the unused bits.
>> >
>> > --jason
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>


Reply via email to