On Aug 21, 2006, at 6:55 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Jason Dillon wrote:
PROPOSAL:
1. Each spec will no longer be split up into trunk+branches+tags.
There will instead be one trunk+branches+tags for all specs laid
out as follows:
specs/trunk/pom.xml
specs/trunk/<artifactId>
specs/tags/<artifactId>-<version>
specs/branches/
What is the layout for branches? Right now it is the major version
with all the specs underneath it. For instance, there is 1_1,
1_1_1 (not sure why we use _'s here and .'s elsewhere). branches
would follow the same layout like:
specs/branches/geronimo-activation_1.0.2/1_1 as opposed to specs/
branches/1_1/geronimo-activation_1.0.2.
Or do you intend to leave branches alone?
I don't plan to touch branches for now... if I did do something I
would change '_' to '.'
I think that we need to evaluate how to best organize branches based
on the new release scheme when it comes time to need a branch.
--jason
