Isn't the best way to just put the updated
files to the M1 repo at
http://people.apache.org/repo/m1-ibiblio-rsync-repository/
or send updated poms to Carlos ?

Personally, I'd prefer not having these poms at all
(speaking of all poms, not these in particular).
The dependencies are not good enough to use
them in a maven 2 project (they include tons
of transitive deps which should be optional / test).
The best would be some really minimal poms
(wihout dependencies, aso).  And for next 1.1.x
releases, it would be nice to have the cars uploaded
as well.

On 10/20/06, Matt Hogstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I received a note from Carlos on the Maven team and it appears there
is an issue with a few artifacts that were released in 1.1 and
1.1.1.  Here is the list of the poms in the Maven 1 repo.

'geronimo:geronimo-javamail-transport:jar:1.1.1'
- Missing 'siteDirectory': Both siteAddress and siteDirectory must be
set at the same time.

'geronimo:geronimo-console-web:jar:1.1.1'
- Missing 'siteDirectory': Both siteAddress and siteDirectory must be
set at the same time.

'geronimo:geronimo-demo:war:1.1.1'
- Missing 'siteDirectory': Both siteAddress and siteDirectory must be
set at the same time.

'geronimo:geronimo-demo:war:1.1'
- Missing 'siteDirectory': Both siteAddress and siteDirectory must be
set at the same time.

I'm not sure how to address the problem since these are artifacts
have been released.  I can fix them going forward but I don't think
there is a way to fix a broken artifact like this.  I would like to
ammend our release procedures to make sure that we have valid poms.
This may not be an issue going forward since we migrated to M2.

I guess the first question is do we have a way to fix these artifacts
in the M1 repo since they've been released.  My thought is no but
hopefully somone else will have a better answer :)

Matt Hogstrom
[EMAIL PROTECTED]






--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet

Reply via email to