On Oct 27, 2006, at 7:34 AM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
> http://people.apache.org/~prasad/ejb-modules.zip
>
> You may remove the <parent> from the top level pom and adjust the
> <groupId> appropriately to build this.
Looks like you have the beans in there. Where is the test code?
-David
> Cheers
> Prasad
>
> On 10/25/06, David Blevins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Great, I'll be looking forward to it.
>>
>> -David
>>
>> On Oct 23, 2006, at 9:36 PM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
>>
>> > Thanx David. I shall try to put it in a sandbox if I can, or
>> else send
>> > you a a patch.
>> >
>> > Cheers
>> > Prasad
>> >
>> > On 10/23/06, David Blevins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On Oct 23, 2006, at 2:34 PM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > I have migrated the openejb-itests module to m2 with the
>> >> intention of
>> >> > using it for G's testsuite. The junit test code will have
to go
>> >> under
>> >> > the ejbcontainer-testsuite under the testsuite framework
>> >> > (geronimo/testsuite).
>> >>
>> >> I don't know which approach would make sense or if there is
some
>> >> middle ground. You have a copy of this migrated code
somewhere I
>> >> could look at/try out?
>> >>
>> >> If we did #2 it'd obviously be a copy as OpenEJB 3 runs those
>> tests
>> >> about 7 times during an average build and another 5 more times
>> on a
>> >> build with assemblies.
>> >>
>> >> -David
>> >>
>> >> > The beans and the ejub jars can go just about anywhere.
So I'd
>> >> like
>> >> > to solicit the suggestion of openejb and geronimo folks on
>> where we
>> >> > should place them
>> >> >
>> >> > 1) Leave them where they are under openejb2/modules/openejb-
>> itests.
>> >> > Get help from openejb commiters to get this commited.
Unlike in
>> >> > previous G releases, this module would now only build the ejb
>> >> jars. No
>> >> > tests would actually run here.
>> >> >
>> >> > 2) Move/copy the ejbs to some place under testsuite and
>> create the
>> >> > jars there. This will keep the ejbs and the tests together.
>> >> Since the
>> >> > moduleId (configId) in the plans should match the m2
>> >> artifactItem id
>> >> > (g:a:v:t), the moduleId in the ejb plans would then become
>> >> > o.a.g.testsuite.*
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > Apart from this decision, other things that need to resolved
>> >> before we
>> >> > put this code in are
>> >> >
>> >> > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENEJB-288
>> >> > http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
>> msg34995.html
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > Cheers
>> >> > Prasad
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>>
>>
>