If there are volunteers that would be great. Heh, I'll volunteer for
EJB 2.1 :)
On Dec 21, 2006, at 5:57 PM, anita kulshreshtha wrote:
On Dec 21, 2006, at 1:50 PM, David Blevins wrote:
http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A--vote--Release-geronimo-
jpa_3.0_spec-1.0-p8013384.html
I like voting on binaries for most our stuff as our build is
massively complex. But in this case I figured I'd give the "do you
trust me to build/publish" angle a try as these are tiny little
jars that aren't complicated and it's way easier to just run the
maven publish command on them after the vote than it is to create a
"staging" build for each one and figuring out a non-trivial way to
publish them later.
IMHO, specs are a perfect candidate for adopt a spec program. Any
PMCer (committer?) gets to adopt one. And yes it does not get named
after them ;-) It all comes down to trust.. WDYT?
Thanks
Anita
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
Matt Hogstrom
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
