Why were these deleted?  This is soo retarded IMO...

If we are going to be using the specs/trunk as a some transient place for specs to live, then it should be completely removed, and each spec should get its own trunk/branches/tags and be treated like a normal project.

Moving stuff in and out of trunk on some ethereal whim is a horrible plan.

--jason


On Jan 4, 2007, at 8:51 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Author: adc
Date: Thu Jan  4 08:51:02 2007
New Revision: 492633

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=492633
Log:
GERONIMO-2692 Removed missing modules

Modified:
    geronimo/specs/trunk/pom.xml

Modified: geronimo/specs/trunk/pom.xml
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/trunk/pom.xml? view=diff&rev=492633&r1=492632&r2=492633 ====================================================================== ========
--- geronimo/specs/trunk/pom.xml (original)
+++ geronimo/specs/trunk/pom.xml Thu Jan  4 08:51:02 2007
@@ -120,13 +120,10 @@
             </activation>

             <modules>
-                <module>geronimo-annotation_1.0_spec</module>
                 <module>geronimo-ejb_3.0_spec</module>
                 <module>geronimo-el_1.0_spec</module>
-                <module>geronimo-interceptor_3.0_spec</module>
                 <module>geronimo-j2ee-management_1.1_spec</module>
                 <module>geronimo-jacc_1.1_spec</module>
-                <module>geronimo-jpa_3.0_spec</module>
                 <module>geronimo-jsp_2.1_spec</module>
                 <module>geronimo-ws-metadata_2.0_spec</module>
             </modules>



Reply via email to