Admin server or boot strap shell might not be a bad idea. Since G needs so many flags to set endorsed + ext dirs muck now, it might be a good idea to introduce a tiny shell which can handle invoking the server correctly. Maybe something to think about for 2.1...

--jason


On Apr 25, 2007, at 12:08 PM, David Jencks wrote:

I agree. I don't think normal geronimo startup should involve copying stuff from one location to another to set up a new server location. We could build some kind of admin server to manage setting up/removing server "clones" but I don't think it should be part of the base server normal startup path. If I've misunderstood what you are proposing please complain :-)

thanks
david jencks

On Apr 25, 2007, at 11:55 AM, Jason Dillon wrote:

Just make users copy the directory and be done with it.

--jason


On Apr 25, 2007, at 4:58 AM, Anita Kulshreshtha wrote:

   On a closer inspection this alternative (2) does not look so
attractive. IIUC, The classes to determine the geronimo install
directory and directory copy are available in system module. Either we duplicate the code in kernel or wait till later (after booting kernel, loading bootstrap configuration..) to fail if the instance data is not
found.
   Yet another alternative (3) is to modify the build and create a
geronimo/var and make 'var' read only.

Thanks
Anita

--- Dain Sundstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

+1

I think the platform scripts should be as thin as possible

-dain

On Apr 24, 2007, at 12:38 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:

..............................
 and then just die

quickly if the directory is missing with an informative error
message to that effect.

--jason


On Apr 24, 2007, at 12:32 PM, Anita Kulshreshtha wrote:

  The other option is to update MainConfigurationBootstrapper as
follows:
1. if geronimo.org.apache.geronimo.server.name system property is
not
set, set it to 'geronimo'.
2. If 'geronimo' dir does not exist, create one and copy 'var' to
it.
3. do the rest...



__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com



Reply via email to