Um... why?

That mens for each release we have a duplicate image? That is crazy man. Thats like saying that each page has the banner image attached to it, though admittedly that is much worse, but its along the same lines as what you are suggesting.

If you recall I originally setup this image to pull from a URL and not from an attachment... and I think it should make its way back to that.

--jason


On May 2, 2007, at 6:40 AM, Hernan Cunico wrote:

I think we should be consistent in the way we manage the attachments with confluence. I rather have them attached to corresponding release page. There are not that many to copy over anyway.

Cheers!
Hernan

Jason Dillon wrote:
We should just add these to the static files we put into the site and use an http link here. Especially if we are going to have per- release pages, we don't want to duplicate those images over and over. Should just svn cp them from site/trunk/art into site/trunk/docs/ images...
--jason
On May 2, 2007, at 6:12 AM, Hernan Cunico wrote:
yeah, that is the autoexported version, the one on confluence (the source!?) looks fine. The autoexport plugin doesn't see attachment updates so those files need to be deleted manually I already opened a JIRA (INFRA-1226) to remove that file so I can export manually the space and finally get that image updated.

Cheers!
Hernan

Jason Dillon wrote:
Hey, I just noticed that the box has some weird looking border on the top+left... any idea where that came from?
--jason
On May 1, 2007, at 1:53 PM, Hernan Cunico wrote:
Let's do it!

I'll start moving some pages around. Do we have a "Geronimo Box" without any specific version? (http://geronimo.apache.org/ downloads.data/geronimo-box-1.1-small.jpg)

Cheers!
Hernan

Sachin Patel wrote:
+1.
-sachin
On May 1, 2007, at 4:21 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
I'd still like to see things organized in the same way that AcitveMQ does:

Reply via email to