Hi Matt, This is a great report .. thanks for taking the time to create it.
Here is my feedback on it- - Run spellcheck :-p there were a few typos here and there like "enough" spelled "ebnough" - The Introduction on page 3 takes about PT, that was a metric you used in the last report, but in this report you are comparing against G1.1.1. The PT is not being used or mentioned throughout the remaining of the report. - Please mention if you need RAIDs or Ramdisks for the DB - I think you forgot the mention the OS version... I assume its SLES "10" SP1 - Quite surprised that we go from 70M unzipped to 111M after initial startup (whats the big hitter here.. the logs??) - The URL at the end of page 8 (more info about daytrader) seems to be incorrect and the link doesnt match the URL - the slowdown in the web primitives is a bit surprising... and yet the jump in direct mode numbers is pretty cool - would have loved to see the Trade Session2JDBC numbers as well - pg 14, 2nd para, typo "due" --> "do" - can we have an appendix at the end of the report with individual run results like last time? HTH, Piyush Agarwal On 10/22/07, Matt Hogstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: > > I've been noodling on this for a bit and wanted to give y'all a > gander at what I have for the performance report at this point. This > is based on 2.0.2 and uses DayTrader 2.0. There are a few numbers > that are missing. I originally had planned on not producing them but > the charts look odd with the missing numbers. It includes a > comparison of 1.1.1 and 2.0.2 using DayTrader 1.2 and 2.0. Heh, we > need to release those monsters. > > This should be considered an alpha release but will move quickly to > final by the end of the week :) > > Please provide your feedback on content, what's interesting, not, etc. > > Thanks for taking a few minutes to look at the draft. > > Look at > http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/performance/geronimo/2.0/<http://people.apache.org/%7Ehogstrom/performance/geronimo/2.0/> > Geronimo2.0.2PerformanceReport-v01draft.pdf > > Thanks >
